Exploring a Popular Genre Mashup: Memoir + Investigative Journalism
Plus, the one rule you need to know
One of the best books I read last year was Susan Cain’s Bittersweet. I loved it for the topic and the compelling question that drove her to write it: “Why do we love to feel sad?”
But it also puzzled me. In the book, Cain shares research and interviews with experts on emotions and how we create meaning from suffering. But it’s also highly autobiographical, exploring Susan’s own relationship with bittersweet music and memories, particularly her painful and poignant relationship with her mother.
On my bookshelves, I usually organize my nonfiction books into two categories: informative nonfiction and creative, or story-driven nonfiction. But when I went to shelve Bittersweet, I had to pause and think about it. Was it a memoir? Yes. Was it informative? Also yes. Where should it go?
And what if you want to write a book like this? How do you structure and position it for the audience?
Cain’s book isn’t alone, either. Michelle McNamara’s I’ll Be Gone in the Dark started as investigative journalism into the story of the Golden State Killer, but acquired a memoir spin when the killer himself found out about her project and began contacting her with clues and information to aid her research. I also recently read Jennie Agg’s book, Life, Almost, which is a beautiful and moving story of her struggle with recurrent miscarriages while also an exploration of the biology of miscarriage and our medical failures to solve this problem. I’m seeing more books like this signed in Publishers Marketplace, too, such as Christina Rivera’s forthcoming My Oceans, which merges both her experiences in motherhood and her research on endangered marine life.
These books are a hybrid of two very distinct genres: memoir (a sub-category of creative nonfiction) and investigative journalism (a sub-category of prescriptive nonfiction).
Genre is such an important consideration in writing because it sets readers’ expectations. Most readers want to know generally what to expect when they buy a book—and if you read 1-, 2-, and 3-star reviews on Amazon, almost all of them are a reflection of disappointed expectations in some way. So authors need to know what readers’ expectations are for the books they’ll be writing, and those are primarily determined by the genre.
The expectations for memoir are very different from the expectations for investigative journalism.
For memoir, readers expect:
A story of the author’s transformation through a specific event/scenario in their life
First-person POV (“I/me/my”)
A cohesive narrative arc or storyline
Use of literary storytelling devices like imagery, dialogue, and starting in media res (to name a few)
For investigative journalism, however, readers expect:
A deep exploration into a single topic or event that has widespread ramifications
Usually prompted by the pursuit to find the answer to a compelling question
In-depth research, including primary source documentation and personal interviews with key experts or others with first-hand knowledge of the subject
Third-person POV (“him/her/they”)
In this way, investigative journalism shares a lot in common with narrative nonfiction (although narrative nonfiction tends to be historical, while investigative journalism tends to be more contemporary)
You can find more in-depth guidance on the investigative journalism genre in the excellent book Story-Based Inquiry by Mark Lee Hunter, which is available for free in the Unesco Digital Library.
Most importantly, memoir is about the author’s transformation, while investigative journalism provides a transformation for the reader. Investigative journalism explores a topic specifically because of its universal impact, while memoir purposely zeroes in on just one person’s experience. Inherently, there’s a conflict there. How do you make them work together?
I find it’s actually fairly common for authors to want to merge memoir with another informative nonfiction genre—but usually, I see this attempted with self-help, rather than investigative journalism. The thinking is, “I’ve been through this hard thing, and I can teach other people how to get through it as well.” However, authors trying to merge memoir and self-help face a similar dilemma because self-help is also about the reader’s transformation, while memoir is about your transformation.
So again, the question is: How do you make them work together?
There’s one rule you need to know about genre mashups:
The reader’s transformation always takes precedence.
In other words, you have to prioritize the reader’s journey above your own. You have to choose a structure that feels intuitive to the reader—and that structure might not neatly mirror your story. Sometimes, authors get lucky and their story does neatly fit into a structure that makes sense for the reader. This is the case in Jennie Agg’s book, where the book follows the timeline of a typical pregnancy to explore what can go wrong at each stage and how the medical field responds—while also sharing her own experience of pregnancy at each stage. It’s also the case in Michelle McNamara’s book, where she becomes, in essence, another expert with first-hand knowledge of the subject.
But often, our personal stories don’t match up with the needs of the reader. Bittersweet, for example, doesn’t follow a chronological account of Cain’s relationship with her mother. Instead, it’s organized into three parts, each exploring a different question relating to bittersweetness:
Part I: Sorrow and Longing: How can we transform pain into creativity, transcendence, and love?
Part II: Winners and Losers: How can we live and work authentically in a “tyranny of positivity”?
Part III: Mortality, Impermanence, and Grief: How should we live, knowing that we and everyone we love will die?
Imagine yourself in Susan Cain’s shoes. You’ve had a hard relationship with your mother and you have an interesting story of how you came to reconcile the light and dark in your relationship. Most first-time authors would simply plunge into their own story, instead of thinking more expansively about the much broader question of bittersweetness and framing the book around that exploration.
And there wouldn’t be anything wrong with making it a straight-out memoir. There are lots of memoirs that are exactly right as memoirs. But, her story, while no doubt compelling and interesting in her own life, is pretty common. I shared last week that if you don’t have an extraordinarily unique memoir story, one of the ways to add a unique angle is to put on your investigative journalism hat. That’s what Cain is doing here. She realized that there’s this more universal question around bittersweetness that she could explore.
The consequence of finding that unique angle, however, is that the structure had to change. The reader’s journey to understand bittersweetness had to come first before her own story.
This can be hard for many first-time authors. The temptation is to “write what you know,” which in most cases, is our own story. And often that is a good first draft place to start. But, as I’ve said many times, readers are inherently selfish—as they have every right to be. They want to know how this is going to apply to them. Your story, while very meaningful and interesting to you and likely your family, isn’t necessarily meaningful and interesting to a wide population of readers who don’t know you personally. Great memoirs are exceptions to this; they usually tell an exceptionally unique story that readers can also find themselves in. They are both entertaining and relatable.
But most memoirs are not great memoirs.
Authors, too, want as many readers as possible to immediately see the relevance of their book so that they’ll pick it up and buy it. Susan Cain is an experienced author—her previous book, Quiet, is a bestselling self-help book—and so she understands how to frame books so that they’ll appeal to as wide an audience as possible. If she had written a memoir about her relationship with her mom, it might have sold well, mostly because she’s Susan Cain and I have no doubt it would have been a well-written memoir. But would it have been an Oprah’s Book Club pick and a #1 New York Times bestseller? In my opinion, unlikely.
By bringing in the reader’s perspective and broadening the scope of her book, she immediately made it more universal and interesting to a much bigger potential audience.
The lesson here? Merging memoir with investigative journalism may be an incredible way to bring in a wider audience for your book and tell a more compelling story. But if you do that, then your story becomes a tool for the reader’s benefit—not catharsis for you. Great authors recognize this and submit themselves to the rule of genre mashups: that the reader’s transformation always takes precedence.
More for You
Why is memoir “so hard to sell”?
Echoing what I've been saying the past few weeks, literary agent Carly Watters posted this absolutely slam-dunk carousel on Instagram about why memoir is a hard sell to publishers. IMO, the most important point is this (from slide #3):
Memoir must also be unbelievable in the sense that it is so unlike our own lives that we are wildly curious about this person's incredible and unique story that is very well told.
Publishing expert and publicist
also commented on the post:From a PR standpoint: Memoir is a tough sell to media because most stories are a dime a dozen. It's got to be something pretty special for media to pay attention.
Jeff Goins on the importance of structure
Jeff is one of my writing mentors and someone I work with often. One of the things I appreciate most about him is that he doesn’t settle for shitty writing. We can take breaks when we need to, but Jeff is pretty relentless about figuring out the right words and making sure a piece of writing works. His latest newsletter about structure is necessary reading, and I appreciated this line:
“Never call a book your baby. This can’t be your baby, because you might have to drop it in the dumpster. It’s a junk draft, mere vomit on the page. You have much more to offer. It will take time and effort, but the good stuff will come. Provided you don’t settle.”
Rethinking our relationship to “vacation”
When I was working my 8-5 (really, more like my 8-7 or sometimes my 8a-10p), I lived for my vacations. And my husband and I took some pretty epic ones: Dubai, Italy, France, London, road trips to Vegas and Utah. I still love traveling, but as a freelancer, my relationship to rest and vacation has changed, and I love it. I no longer earn vacation time. Sometimes I joke that my boss is so mean; she doesn’t give me any vacation. But actually, I love that I can take “vacation” or an afternoon off or whatever I want anytime, without any guilt or asking permission associated with it. This thoughtful newsletter from Anna Codrea-Rado reminded me of how blessed I am to live this life.
Should we just do away with blurbs?
I’ve been thinking about blurbs a lot lately, for a few reasons. 1) One of my best friends has been requesting them for her book, and having a heck of a time getting responses. 2) I was recently asked to endorse another book. And 3) I realize I’m going to be expected to ask people for endorsements next year as we prepare for the launch of Hungry Authors. But do they even work? Do the people endorsing the books even read them? And are they worth the effort it takes to get them? This article is an outstanding analysis of everything that is wrong with book blurbs.
So many good quotes in here, but this one struck me:
“Blurbs expose this ecosystem for what it really is: a nepotism-filled system that everyone endures for a chance of ‘making it’ in an impossible industry for most.”
I wish we could do away with blurbs altogether, but it seems blurbs are really most useful for booksellers and publicity. Sigh.
8 Ways to Use ChatGPT
While I don't agree with all of these tips, there are a few in this TikTok that are genius!
Don't Make a Bad Argument
I've been talking a lot lately about having an interesting, compelling argument for your book. This article on Jane Friedman's site helped me remember that one of the reasons this is so hard for authors is that we don't have a lot of good examples of how to argue well! Instead, the arguments we most often see are full of logical fallacies. This article, while not about writing books, is still a handy guide to avoiding bad arguments.
What’s Bringing Me Joy
After a few weeks of fun and family, I'm knee-deep in writing land again, with a big deadline looming in early October (not counting the Hungry Authors book, which Liz & I are working on!). Even with all that, I'm looking forward to presenting tomorrow in a publishing panel at the Refined Conference!